Last week
Yet this is just a fraction
of the full financial windfall the seed industry could hope to extract from
farmers if they could apply Terminator technology to all their seed lines worldwide.
This figure is thought likely to run to billions of extra dollars per year. In Brazil, host country to the CBD, soybean farmers could face US$407m in extra seed costs if they were unable to re-use harvested seed. Even Canadian wheat farmers, whose government is one of the leading proponents of Terminator at the CBD, could be stung with an annual bill of US$85m.
Four rich countries
promoted "case by case risk assesment" for Terminator technology: Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the UK (supported on the sidelines by the US, which is not a party to the CBD). This "case by case" clause would open the door to field trialling and commercialisation of sterile seed technology.
Roberto Requião, Governor
of Brazil's Paraná state, opened the CBD conference with a strong condemnation
of Terminator: “Suicide seeds are the next step in the transnational industry's
strategy to control the production and commercial use of seeds," he
told the opening plenary of 3000 delegates. "It
is one more step by transnational industry to obtain total control over the
production of grain."
But in a development which
ought to hearten those seeking to give full effect to the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation or Kyoto Climate Change Treaties, the “terminators”
failed. Following last Friday’s decision
by the CBD to refuse to end the moratorium on Terminator technology, Francisca Rodriguez of Via Campesina,
a worldwide movement of peasant farmers, said: "This is a momentous day for the 1.4 billion poor people
worldwide, who depend on farmer saved seeds. Terminator seeds are a weapon of
mass destruction and an assault on our food sovereignty.”
Benedikt Haerlin, Director of Save our Seeds and the
Foundation on Future of Farming, Germany, said: “This victory today marks the beginning of the end of Terminator
technologies, not so much because of the text adopted and rejected, but because
it has been won by a uniquely broad and diverse coalition of peasants, farmers,
social movements and environmental organisations who are supported by the vast
majority of delegates.”
Comments